"So many international
aid groups working in Papua have been pushed out by the government,"
Andreas Harsono, a researcher for Human Rights Watch (HRW) who has been
covering Indonesia for years, told IRIN, citing a string of NGOs and
charity groups, as well as the International Committee of the Red Cross
(ICRC), that have had to leave.
"They can maintain a presence
if they work with the government, but if they give aid directly to
Papuans or Papuan organizations, aid groups will be heavily scrutinized
by the government and suspected of aiding the independence movement."
The resource-rich Papua region (2,000km east of Jakarta and comprising
the provinces of Papua and West Papua) has the lowest levels of human
development of
Indonesia's 33 provinces,
with about 34 percent of Papuans living on less than US$1 per day,
according to government statistics. The region has a land area nearly
twice that of the UK but a population of only 3.5 million.
"There are multiple issues facing West Papua and Papua today," said Dini
Sari Djalal, head of communications at the World Bank's Jakarta office.
"Among the most vital are poverty, maternal mortality and
HIV/AIDS. The two provinces rank worst in these indicators in all of Indonesia."
At the same time, the region is prone to a host of natural disasters, one of the most recent being a 6.1 magnitude
quake on 8 September recorded off the coast of Nabire, Papua.
"In the West Papuan cities of Manokwari and Sorong, earthquakes are
recorded on a fairly regular basis as is flooding," said Phillip
Charlesworth, the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent
Societies head of delegation for Indonesia.
But it is Papua's decades-long simmering separatist movement that has often dominated international media attention.
Although the government granted the region Special Autonomy status in 2001, activists continue to voice their
discontent, calling for greater autonomy to help improve the region's socioeconomic problems.
Native Papuans are benefiting neither from the land and forests
exploited by outside timber and palm oil companies, nor the region's
immense mineral wealth, including gold, copper and other metals, they
say.
This summer, the International Crisis Group reported at
least 15 violent incidents in the provincial capital Jayapura in May and
June, and others in the central highlands.
Since the former
Dutch colony was annexed in 1969, a small armed group known as the Free
Papua Organization (OPM) has been fighting for Papuan independence.
Human rights groups estimate some 100,000 Papuans have died in the
conflict since the 1960s, while local media regularly report on clashes
between the OPM and security forces.
Economic marginalization,
coupled with an ongoing influx of labour migrants from elsewhere in
Indonesia continues to fuel tension, particularly over the issue of
jobs.
In many of the region's cities and towns, non-native
Papuans are now in a majority, and tensions between the two groups are
not uncommon, as are reports of the government's often heavy-handed
response towards the indigenous population.
"We continue to
receive credible reports that Indonesian security forces are committing
unlawful killings, and torture [in the Papua region]. They're using
excessive force when carrying out arrests or during public policing, and
are criminalizing peaceful political activism," said Josef Roy
Benedict, Amnesty International's Indonesia campaigner, based in London.
These actions violate the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the
Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Indonesia is a state party of the former and has ratified the latter convention, Benedict added.
Some aid groups not welcome
"We'd welcome the help of more international organizations, but there's
a need for the government to open up the space for them to see the
reality here," said Julianus Septer Manufandu, executive secretary of
the Papua NGO Forum, a network of 118 local NGOs assisting Papuans in
human rights, land disputes, natural resources and emergency response.
Currently, five UN agencies are working in the
region.
The Indonesian Red Cross (
PMI) is also on the ground, assisting with blood donations, cataract operations and disaster management.
"We're neutral, so we give victims of the [low-level] conflict
humanitarian assistance and the government has no problem with that,"
said PMI Secretary-General Budi Atmadi Adiputro.
However, others have been less successful.
"One reason why our MoU [memorandum of understanding] was not renewed
was because we supported local partners who were involved in human
rights work," said Ernest Schoffelen, a programme officer with the
Catholic Organization for Relief and Development (
Cordaid),
a Dutch development agency working in the area of health,
peace-building, inter-religious dialogue and human rights in the region
for over 50 years.
"Papuans were very welcoming of the aid we
provided," Schoffelen said. "The resistance to our presence came more
from central government. They didn't want us to be there."
Tortuous NGO registration process
"Everything goes through the Indonesian Foreign Ministry and BIN [the
Indonesian State Intelligence Agency]," said one international aid
worker who asked not be named, adding it could take 1-3 years for an
international NGO to be registered. "All INGOs [international NGOs]
proposing to work in Indonesia must appear before an interdepartmental
panel, in which the specific ministry or department under which the INGO
would work argues the case for the INGO to be allowed."
Those involved in peace-building activities face an even tougher time, he added.
"The level of scrutiny on the part of BIN is extremely high," the aid
worker said. "For groups working in peace-building advocacy or legal
affairs - which are considered political activities rather than
technical development - there's virtually no chance."
ICRC
first opened an office in Jayapura (Papuan capital) in 1989. The office
was closed in 2009 following an instruction from the Indonesian
government, also addressed to a number of other organizations.
Prior to 2009, ICRC delivered water access and sustainable living
environment programmes; international humanitarian law (IHL)
dissemination work with the military, police and journalists; and
detention visits to ensure the humane treatment of prisoners.
The government reportedly raised objections to the ICRC's presence in Papua for not reporting
prison visits to the authorities.
Today the ICRC's presence in the two provinces is limited to ad hoc missions from the head office in Jakarta.
"We still play a supporting role to the work of the Indonesian Red
Cross there, and we organize punctual activities, such as IHL
dissemination sessions for the Air Force in Biak [a small island to the
north]," said Patrick Megevand, the ICRC's Jakarta Regional Delegation
communication coordinator.
"We hope to go back there on a more
sustainable basis. For now, everything depends upon the renewal of an
agreement with the government, which we've been negotiating since the
closure of the office in 2009."
Security, political considerations
Others cite security concerns and restrictions on freedom of movement, particularly in the interior.
"The work we did there was valuable and there is a need for an
international presence," one former aid worker with an INGO that closed
down its Papua operation in 2011 claimed, adding however: "Our
international staff received threats, and then national staff started to
receive threats from the government."
Oxfam's country
director Richard Mawer, said security was not affecting their work on
the ground there, but added that all INGOs were finding it increasingly
difficult to be given approval to work there, and now required special
permission to implement any new initiatives.
Government response
The Indonesian government, meanwhile, says it is just operating standard procedures.
Foreign Ministry spokesman Michael Tene told IRIN there were no special
requirements for INGOs to work in Papua, noting that there were already
at least 14 working in the region on health, economic development and
natural disaster issues. He added that all must abide by a set of
general requirements, which included not engaging in profit-orientated
activities or fundraising.
For international NGOs wanting to work in the area of human rights in Papua and West Papua, Tene said:
"Human rights is an important issue in Papua and all of Indonesia, but
INGOs must not engage in political activities and must convince the
government they do not intend to do this. Their work has to benefit the
people [of Papua and West Papua]."